Guidelines for high-intensity training for riders over 50

Three steps on how older riders can do intervals for time-effective training.


Member Exclusive

Become a member to unlock this story and receive other great perks.

Join

Already a member?

Sign In

The most effective and efficient use of your time and energy to increase training intensity is to do some type of interval training.

Important point: When you perform intervals, the absolute intensity, the duration of the repetitions, the number of repetitions, and the duration of recovery between intervals must be only slightly more challenging than your estimated current capacity for physical stress.

What that means is that you must know or be able to sense your physical limits and not exceed them. It’s best to take a conservative approach to intervals if it’s been a while since you last did such a workout. Don’t try to get in shape in just a handful of these sessions. Too much, too soon will nearly always result in a breakdown of some sort, such as injury. Take a long-term approach—as in several weeks—to safely produce the results you want.

Because an interval session can be quite stressful, it should be preceded by a gradually progressive warm-up. This approach has also been shown to improve workout performance. Stop the workout when a reasonable workout goal is attained, when it is apparent that high-end performance is declining, or when the effort feels unusually high for the output (pace, speed, power). My advice to the athletes I’ve coached for the past 30-some years has always been the same: Stop when you know you can do only one more interval. The last interval is the one to be most wary of, so simply don’t do it.

Go with whatever you are comfortable using and whatever is most repeatable for you.

Note that I am not going to describe specific interval workouts for each individual endurance sport. I am going to assume that as a lifelong athlete, you are familiar with interval training and that you either have a record of or remember the interval workouts for your sport that have worked for you in the past. If this is not the case, you will need to research the proper interval training for your sport.

I am also not going to prescribe specific methodology for measuring intensity. Again, I am going to assume that your years in your sport have given you a strong foundation in monitoring the intensity of your workouts. You can use a rating of perceived exertion (RPE), heart rate, lactate threshold heart rate, or functional threshold power if you are using a power meter and are familiar with that measurement. Go with whatever you are comfortable using and whatever is most repeatable for you.

I recommend that you keep track of your heart rate even if you do not use it to measure intensity. Heart rate is a useful component in determining the state of your fitness and the rate at which you are improving it, as you will see below.

If you have been diagnosed with coronary heart disease, have concerns about your heart health, or are taking statins or other medications that alter heart rate, then you should consult your doctor before starting an interval training program. Fortunately, the risk of heart attack among otherwise apparently healthy athletes as they age is quite low.

Photo: Mattia Cioni / Unsplash

If you’ve previously done intervals throughout your sport career but have had a gap in recent years, then you know how to get started again. Just be conservative (as I mentioned before) with the progression of this workout. If long, slow distance training has been your only training method, you may need some guidelines for getting started with interval training. Here is what I suggest for the first few sessions for someone who has not done interval training recently.

Step 1. Warm up 10–30 minutes gradually, ratcheting intensity up to a moderate effort. It’s common for older athletes to need more warm-up time than young athletes. Warm-up may also vary by sport. For example, it is typically longer for cycling than for running. Swimming generally falls between these two.

Step 2. Do 3 × 3-minute intervals with each interval at or slightly below lactate (anaerobic) threshold and 1 minute of light recovery between them. As I mentioned before, the gauge of intensity for an interval workout such as this may be based on heart rate, pace, speed, power, or perceived exertion. Some of these measurements are better than others, depending on the sport. Heart rate–based intensity is perhaps the worst way to gauge how hard to work with intervals, especially short ones of a few minutes or less, as heart rate rises slowly during each interval. It may take several minutes to achieve lactate threshold, during which time you are left guessing how hard to work. Most athletes err on the side of starting intervals too fast to force heart rate up quickly, and then they slow down later as the goal heart rate is finally achieved. This is just the opposite of what should be done; instead, you want to finish each interval with a slightly higher intensity than when you started.

Step 3. Cool down with several minutes of easy exercise. As with the warmup, the duration of the cooldown depends on the sport, with cycling typically long and running relatively short.

When you are going faster at the same level of effort, it’s time to make some changes.

At first you should most likely do only one such interval workout in a seven-day period. Over time, however, you can increase the number of weekly sessions to two if you have the stamina and time. It’s not common for senior athletes to be capable of doing more than two of these in a week. I’ve coached some who could, but they are rare and more likely in their 50s than their 70s.

An indicator of improving fitness is that the speed or power of your intervals increases relative to your heart rate (this is where keeping track of your heart rate during interval training comes in, as mentioned before). That’s always a sure sign of improving aerobic fitness. To determine this, divide the combined average speed (run, swim, Nordic ski) or normalized power (bike or row) for all of the intervals by their combined average heart rate (see my book The Power Meter Handbook for details on this). The increase in this ratio is the indicator that your aerobic fitness is improving. TrainingPeaks calls this ratio the “efficiency factor” (EF).

For example, let’s say you did 3 × 3-minute intervals running at just below lactate threshold, and the combined average pace of the intervals was 7:15 per mile. To convert pace to speed, divide 60 by 7.25, and you’ll find that the speed of the intervals was 8.3 mph. That’s a speed of 243 yards per minute (8.3 × 1,760 yards in a mile divided by 60, the number of minutes in an hour). Yards and minutes are easier to work with than miles and hours for our purpose. And let’s say the combined average heart rate of all of the intervals was 150. That means your EF for that workout was 1.62 (243 ÷ 150 = 1.62). As that number increases, your aerobic fitness is also improving.

Photo: Kayle Kaupanger / Unsplash

Now, if you don’t have a pacing or power device, or even a heart rate monitor—or if using those tools seems like too much math and measurement—we can simplify the decision regarding when to bump your intervals up. If you are familiar with the RPE method mentioned earlier, you probably know it isn’t nearly as accurate as power meters, pacing devices, and heart rate monitors, but it’ll do in a pinch. Simply do the intervals at the same perceived effort as usual and make a conscious determination during the intervals whether you seem to be going faster than the last time you did them. If you are on a measured course, you can time your intervals. This effort will never be “easy.” But if you do the intervals at roughly the same effort each time, over time you will go faster as fitness improves. The RPE method is best on a measured course using a stopwatch. Old school, but it still works.

When you are going faster at the same level of effort, it’s time to make some changes. As the EF for your interval sessions rises (meaning you get faster at the same effort), you will need to increase the number of intervals. As these longer interval workouts become more tolerable with a rising EF, begin to gradually increase the duration of the individual intervals. The recovery time between them should be about one-third of the preceding interval time. For example, after a 3-minute interval, recover for 1 minute. When you can manage about 20 minutes of total combined interval time in a single workout (such as 4 intervals of 5 minutes each at lactate threshold with 1 minute 40 seconds of recovery between them), then you are ready to move on to more intense intervals.

The next stage in the progression for those just getting back into high-intensity training is to move up to aerobic-capacity intervals. To do this, start with 5 to 10 intervals of 30 to 60 seconds each with recoveries between them of the same duration, for a total of 5 minutes of intervals in a single session (e.g., 10 × 30 seconds or 5 × 60 seconds). This time, however, do them above the lactate threshold. As a memory refresher: Lactate threshold is the intensity at which you first begin to experience labored breathing. You should feel as if you are working quite hard on these aerobic-capacity intervals, but they aren’t quite an all-out effort.

Go fast when you feel like it, go slow when you feel like it.

Aerobic-capacity speed or power is the highest average speed or power you can sustain for about 5 minutes. If you really want to know what that number is for you right now (it varies with changes in fitness), do an all-out 5-minute time trial on your own to find your average speed or power for that duration. Or you could have a VO2max test done in a university lab, medical clinic, health club, or sporting goods store or by a coach. If you go the test route, be sure to ask the technician what your top-end or VO2max speed or power was.

Rather than doing a time trial or lab test, you can get a rough estimate of your VO2max output by multiplying your speed or power at lactate threshold (perhaps found in the round of intervals described above) by 1.05 and 1.2. That will give you a range to shoot for on each of these aerobic-capacity intervals. Start at the low end of this range, and over time gradually increase the intensity to the upper end.

If you prefer to be somewhat less structured in your training, do these initial VO2max intervals as “fartlek.” That’s a Swedish term for “speed play” that has been commonly used by athletes, especially runners, for the past 70 years to mean “unstructured intervals.” To do such a workout, start with a warm-up. Then go fast when you feel like it, go slow when you feel like it, and complete as many of these fast segments as you feel like doing. As explained earlier, you still must pay attention to how you feel throughout the workout, being cautious not to do so many fast segments that you can’t fully recover within three days.

You can make short-term improvements that produce immediate results while also greatly slowing the long-term losses.

After a few weeks, and once you are fully adapted to high-intensity training, your aerobic capacity should be increasing. You can measure that as before with the 5-minute time trial, or you can undergo a technician-administered test. You may also simply discover that you’re going faster in your workouts for the same effort. Depending on your fitness at the start of this program, your rate of workout progression, the number of such sessions completed, and your age, it would not be unusual to see a 5 percent improvement in VO2max in about eight weeks. And by continuing such training in future years, your rate of loss of aerobic capacity should be no greater than about 5 percent per decade.

What if your personal limiter isn’t aerobic capacity but rather lactate threshold? Just because nearly all of the research has found VO2max to be the aging athlete’s primary limiter, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s that way for all serious senior athletes.

First let me say that this situation is rare. Nevertheless, it would likely be the case if your known VO2max or 5-minute time trial speed has declined by less than about 5 percent per decade, or around half a percentage point in a year. If this describes your recent experience, then you may benefit from devoting a good portion of your training to sub-lactate-threshold sessions, as described earlier. That could mean fewer aerobic-capacity interval sessions. Note, however, that some research has found that doing aerobic-capacity intervals is also an effective way to boost lactate threshold. So both types of intervals may improve your fitness even if your aerobic capacity is stable.

Let’s move on to another form of high-intensity training that addresses one of the other big three limiters for senior athletes: the loss of muscle mass with aging.


Adapted from Fast After 50 by Joe Friel, with permission of VeloPress.

Fast After 50