Scott Moninger’s statement regarding his positive drug test
Scott Moninger's e-mailed statementNov 19, 2002Dear friends, family and fellow cyclists,On or around the 22nd of November, certain information regarding myselfwill become public. It will not be good news but I thought that hearingmy side of the story first, might lessen the shock a little when you doread this, or hear about it in a few days. Some of what you will read inthe media and hear on the streets will be accurate, and some of it willnot. I can assure you however, that everything written here in this e-mailis 100 percent fact.In early July I began preparing for one of the biggest
Don't miss a moment from Paris-Roubaix and Unbound Gravel, to the Giro d’Italia, Tour de France, Vuelta a España, and everything in between when you join Outside+.
When I’m asked why I don’t race more in Europe, it’s because I don’tdo drugs and I don’t want to be forced to do drugs. I don’t like cheatersand I don’t have any respect for an athlete who thinks they have to takedrugs to win. I did not get into this sport to destroy my body. Anyonewho’s ever competed with or against me knows how strongly I feel aboutthe subject of drugs in sports and they know how much I value my own healthand well-being.The lab results confirmed what I had suspected. Each 500mg.capsule ofthe legal amino acid supplement (L-Tyrosine) was contaminated with an averageof 28mg. of 19-norandrosterone. This is more than a slight contaminationbut rather a gross one.I now had the peace of mind that I was searching for but unfortunately,the drug testing agency does not consider a contaminated supplement asa valid excuse for a positive test. An athlete could knowingly take a contaminatedsupplement and then always have that as an “out” or defense. To the drugtesting agency it’s very black and white: A positive is a positive regardlessof how it came about, knowingly, or unknowingly.With intent, or without intent, the penalties are the same. They areaware of the growing problem of contaminated or mis-marked legal supplementsbut are unwilling to make any allowances in the matter.For a first offender, like myself, the maximum sanction for a 19-norandrosteronepositive test is a two-year suspension. With the help of my lawyer, weare fighting this with everything we have. We did not accept the initialsanction of two years and have requested a hearing, which is allowed bythe drug testing agency. We will plead our case as best we can but thetesting agency is not in the business of leniency. They are in the businessof prosecuting what they feel to be guilty athletes. At this point thereis zero chance of this going away completely and probably the best casescenario is a reduced sentence of 6 months. This will happen only withthe help and recommendation of USA cycling and the UCI, which are bothcompletely separate from the drug testing agency.What the future holds: After first learning of my positive test, I returnedto the same store and purchased every bottle they had of this L-Tyrosineamino acid. In all I found four that had the same lot and serial numbersas my original bottle. These are still completely sealed and unopened.They will be invaluable as I/we plan to take legal action against the manufacturer,the supplier, and the retailer of this contaminated product.Prior to all of this, I had planned to compete for 1-2 more years. (Yes,I know I’ve been saying that for the last ten years but I really don’tplan to be a professional cyclist when I’m 40!) My team is being slightly”downsized” at the moment, but I had a spot on its roster for the 2003season. The management of the team has been very understanding and supportiveof my situation and will continue to stand behind me in hopes that thingsproceed in a favorable direction for me.I apologize for the delay in making this announcement to all of youbut I know how rumors can spread in cycling especially when this is thesubject matter. I’ve also waited as long as possible in making this announcementin hopes of having all the answers to the questions I will be asked.Unfortunately, that is still not the case as the hearing with the testingagency has not yet happened nor do I know yet, what sort of sanction, ifany, the UCI has decided on.Thank you for reading and at the risk of seeming presumptuous, I thankyou all, in advance for your support.Scott Moninger(PS. feel free to forward this e-mail on to anyone who you think wouldbe interested in reading it)