Get access to everything we publish when you join VeloNews or Outside+.
Do you want to contribute to Mailbag, a regular feature of VeloNews.com? Here’s how:
- Keep it short. And remember that we reserve the right to edit for grammar, length and clarity.
- Include your full name, hometown and state or nation.
- Send it to firstname.lastname@example.org.
ATOC team picks
I am really not sure what AEG and/or Medalist Sports is thinking with their Amgen Tour of California team selections.
Jamis-Sutter Home won the National Racing Calendar series last year. In other words, it’s the best team in the United States.
Jelly Belly? Planet Energy? Come on.
Santa Rosa, California
Fished in! Fished in!
I really thought the article was legit at first, and then I remembered it was April 1, and then caught the drift. It was initially believable and seemed plausible until mention was made of the characteristic gesture!
WAY TO GO!!!!!
Alvaro “Bud” Valdez II
Punish the whole team
I have often wondered why cycling doesn’t adopt more of a “team” penalty strategy for doping violations. If a college basketball player has done something in violation of NCAA rules, the entire team may risk forfeiting its entire season.
If the team GC team leader is clean but a domestique isn’t, didn’t that GC rider (and therefore his team) benefit from the assistance provided by a dirty rider? If I’m at the top of the GC but it’s primarily because my support riders are doped, do I still get to claim innocence just because I’m clean?
I was in France in 1993 when a tour operator staff member noted his talent level wasn’t high enough to survive as a domestique without drugs but if he went that way, he would have a career. He decided to become a mechanic instead but when riding, his team leader went on to win a few Tours de France.
Teams with anti-doping stances are moving in the right directions but imagine the internal pressure for all to stay clean if riders knew all of their results could be wiped out because he or she got help from a tainted team member?