Don't miss a moment from Paris-Roubaix and Unbound Gravel, to the Giro d’Italia, Tour de France, Vuelta a España, and everything in between when you join Outside+.
LIMOGES, France (AFP) — Tour de France champion Chris Froome was on the defensive on Tuesday following criticism from sprinters who say GC riders don’t belong in sprint finishes.
His fellow Briton Mark Cavendish on Monday hit out at Froome’s Sky team for keeping its leader near the front of the peloton in sprint finishes, consequently getting in the way of the bunch’s fast men.
[related title=”More Tour de France news” align=”right” tag=”Tour-de-France”]
But following Tuesday’s stage 4 won by Marcel Kittel, Froome, 31, said he had no choice, even claiming he’d rather not be near the front.
“It makes for a lot of stress — we don’t want to be up there, we want the sprinters to do their thing and not be in the way,” he said. “But when grand tours can be won or lost by seconds, we’ve got to be up there fighting.
“That’s the nature of our sport. When there’s so much at stake — a stage win at the Tour means so much to so many people — guys are going to put their bodies on the line for that.”
While Froome had been seen sprinting hard at the end of Monday’s third stage, coming 22nd at the line, he was almost caught out by a traffic island just before a roundabout in the run-in to Tuesday’s fourth stage.
He clawed his way back through the field to finish 37th, though, and avoided losing any time to his rivals. And he said Wednesday’s stage 5 should provide some fireworks among the overall contenders.
The 216km stage has a decidedly lumpy final 75 kilometers with five categorized climbs, including two second category ones in the final 30km.
“I think it’s a bit too early to see a real GC battle but it’s definitely somewhere where there will be time gaps,” said Froome. “It won’t be a bunch sprint. Maybe it’s a stage for someone like [Julian] Alaphilippe, [Alejandro] Valverde or Dan Martin.”
Do GC riders and their teams really belong in sprint finishes? Read the VeloNews roundtable debate >>